| home | painting | sculpture | corporate work | installations | photography | biography | contact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| home | painting | sculpture | corporate work | installations | photography | biography | contact |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
With my installation ‘Eye Candy’, in which the space and models are
controlled by myself, am I celebrating male beauty or the female
viewer’s gaze at male beauty without any sexual innuendo or
vulgarity? The male models are the subject matter and controlled by
the artist. I am trying to treat the male in the same way the female
has been seen; in other words the ideal spectator is female and the
image of the male should be to flatter her. Attempting to reverse
the statement made by John Berger in 1972, he wrote in Ways of
Seeing, of our fundamental assumption to images of women: (Eye Candy
Stills, Installation) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||